From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Reordering etc/NEWS Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 00:37:19 +0300 Message-ID: References: <2wmz0iriyj.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1178573850 3898 80.91.229.12 (7 May 2007 21:37:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 21:37:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 07 23:37:28 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HlAtY-0005oW-0f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 May 2007 23:37:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HlB0Y-00029w-Ev for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 May 2007 17:44:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HlB0V-00027J-VL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 May 2007 17:44:35 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HlB0V-00026O-G8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 May 2007 17:44:35 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HlB0V-00026E-Dz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 May 2007 17:44:35 -0400 Original-Received: from romy.inter.net.il ([213.8.233.24]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HlAtT-0005E2-9J; Mon, 07 May 2007 17:37:19 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-83-130-1-164.inter.net.il [83.130.1.164]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id HUH67072 (AUTH halo1); Tue, 8 May 2007 00:37:19 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: (message from Richard Stallman on Mon, 07 May 2007 12:50:26 -0400) X-detected-kernel: FreeBSD 4.7-5.2 (or MacOS X 10.2-10.4) (2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:70637 Archived-At: > From: Richard Stallman > CC: rgm@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 07 May 2007 12:50:26 -0400 > > We know that. But, while waiting for this issue to be resolved, > there's no need to install changes that do not fix very grave bugs. > > That is what I think, and that is why the only nontrivial changes I > have installed were to fix grave bugs. It should be clear by now that we have very different ideas about what is a grave bug. Perhaps if you took a few minutes to explain your criteria, much of the argument could be avoided. > Furthemore, I take offense at the insult which is implied by saying > this to me as if you thought I needed to be taught this by you. There was no insult and therefore no reason to take offense. It's just a simple difference of judgment about what is a grave bug. OTOH, you have no more right to teach me manners than I have to teach you what is a sound release procedure. While the latter is a technical issue that is on-topic in this forum, the former is not (unless I behave in an uncivilized manner, which I don't think is the case). > I have been insulted and abused many times here lately. I did not > respond to most of these insults, but I did take offense. Same here.