From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Carbon port emacs-unicode-2 build problem under MacOSX
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 12:34:54 +0200
Message-ID: <uwssrpv01.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <m21wb3vayb.fsf@news.cyberhut.org> <47305F6E.2030204@gnu.org>
	<m2fxzjw4xu.fsf@lifelogs.com>
	<loom.20071107T111446-237@post.gmane.org> <4731D43F.3060007@gnu.org>
	<jwvbqa6oxea.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<E1IpzDv-00082q-3D@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<200711081556.lA8Fulm5016419@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu>
	<E1IqLEN-0006Vk-3Y@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<200711090747.lA97loNF007692@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1194604512 15874 80.91.229.12 (9 Nov 2007 10:35:12 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 10:35:12 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: Adrian.B.Robert@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Dan Nicolaescu <dann@ics.uci.edu>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 09 11:35:15 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1IqRCj-0005Wp-BH
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2007 11:35:13 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IqRCX-0002Jg-Sj
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2007 05:35:01 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IqRCU-0002IV-Ct
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2007 05:34:58 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IqRCS-0002Fp-Bw
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2007 05:34:57 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IqRCS-0002Fk-9r
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2007 05:34:56 -0500
Original-Received: from heller.inter.net.il ([213.8.233.23])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1IqRCR-0001lF-ON
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2007 05:34:56 -0500
Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-202-76.inter.net.il
	[84.228.202.76]) by heller.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA)
	with ESMTP id EBY01985 (AUTH halo1);
	Fri, 9 Nov 2007 12:34:53 +0200 (IST)
In-reply-to: <200711090747.lA97loNF007692@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> (message
	from Dan Nicolaescu on Thu, 08 Nov 2007 23:47:50 -0800)
X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: FreeBSD 4.7-5.2 (or MacOS X
	10.2-10.4) (2)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:82856
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/82856>

> From: Dan Nicolaescu <dann@ics.uci.edu>
> Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2007 23:47:50 -0800
> Cc: Adrian.B.Robert@gmail.com, jasonr@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca,
> 	emacs-devel@gnu.org
> 
> I respectfully disagree with that statement. I think you might
> underestimate the effort that would take to do rewrite the logs. Based
> on my experience with doing this for the multi-tty branch I don't
> think this is the case. I would estimate at least a day of work do get
> that done (might take a lot more than that though).

Could you please describe the kinds of changes you needed to perform,
apart of replacing multiple entries for new functions/variables with a
single entry like "(foo): New function."?

I don't question your experience, I just cannot imagine too many other
changes that need to be done.  (Richard already said that
non-simplifying editing is not needed.)  Maybe I'm missing something,
or perhaps you took the editing job too seriously and did a much more
perfect job than was minimally needed.

If you explanations are convincing, perhaps I'll even volunteer to do
the job ;-)

TIA