From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: redisplay-dont-pause does not work Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 15:11:33 +0300 Message-ID: References: <85y7wqz896.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85verttfr2.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85psi0klmx.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85bqtik2ua.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85k681dxc4.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1149163937 23769 80.91.229.2 (1 Jun 2006 12:12:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 12:12:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 01 14:12:13 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Flm1p-0005wI-6Z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Jun 2006 14:11:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Flm1o-00083Q-8h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Jun 2006 08:11:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Flm1e-00083L-3p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jun 2006 08:11:42 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Flm1c-00082y-Kb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jun 2006 08:11:41 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Flm1c-00082v-Ga for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jun 2006 08:11:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.66] (helo=romy.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Flm7k-0006Lr-Tq; Thu, 01 Jun 2006 08:18:01 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-83-130-235-62.inter.net.il [83.130.235.62]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id ETL27987 (AUTH halo1); Thu, 1 Jun 2006 15:11:31 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: David Kastrup In-reply-to: <85k681dxc4.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup on Thu, 01 Jun 2006 11:44:27 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:55546 Archived-At: > From: David Kastrup > Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 11:44:27 +0200 > Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > The effect with a non-zero argument to sit-for is that redisplay > happens immediately, then the wait is commenced until (or unless) > input is available. Which appears natural enough. Not only is it natural, I think it would be a bug if it worked any other way: one of sit-for's purposes is to let the user to read a message that is displayed for a short duration of time. If sit-for would wait first and redisplay after that, it would defeat this purpose.