From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: 23.0.50; face-problems with multy-tty Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 06:15:22 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87ejhcmgp2.fsf@baldur.tsdh.de> <200709062116.l86LGWnO000262@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1190607346 12453 80.91.229.12 (24 Sep 2007 04:15:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 04:15:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: bojohan+news@dd.chalmers.se (Johan =?utf-8?Q?Bockg=C3=A5rd?=) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 24 06:15:42 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IZfM8-0000eW-6X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 06:15:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IZfM4-0003cK-Tz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 00:15:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IZfM1-0003c0-JR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 00:15:29 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IZfLz-0003bm-Tm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 00:15:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IZfLz-0003bj-Nv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 00:15:27 -0400 Original-Received: from romy.inter.net.il ([213.8.233.24]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IZfLz-0003at-Cn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 00:15:27 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-83-130-218-199.inter.net.il [83.130.218.199]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id IYO11443 (AUTH halo1); Mon, 24 Sep 2007 06:15:13 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: (bojohan+news@dd.chalmers.se) X-Detected-Kernel: FreeBSD 4.7-5.2 (or MacOS X 10.2-10.4) (2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:79666 Archived-At: > From: bojohan+news@dd.chalmers.se (Johan =?utf-8?Q?Bockg=C3=A5rd?=) > Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 02:00:21 +0200 > > The case I'm worried about is when you want to reset the faces from > the init file with `C-x C-e' on the custom-set-faces form (or by > loading the file). Nobody said that C-x C-e on a custom-set-faces form should do what you want. A custom-set-faces form is not a regular Lisp form, as far as its effects are concerned. Custom's normal modus operandi is through "M-x customize-face". > Note that this is how it already worked before the recent changes. > custom-set-faces used to operate by changing the new-frame defaults. Which I think was correct behavior, as far as I understand the issue. > The problem is that that doesn't distinguish between different kinds > of frames. What different kinds of frames are those?