From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Choice of fonts displaying etc/HELLO Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 16:51:26 +0300 Message-ID: References: <48900ED2.2000703@gnu.org> <4890670C.9000009@gnu.org> <48906865.4000808@gnu.org> <48907856.6040308@gnu.org> <48930CE4.5080305@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1217598861 17180 80.91.229.12 (1 Aug 2008 13:54:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 13:54:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, handa@m17n.org To: Jason Rumney Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 01 15:55:11 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KOv53-0006gN-31 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:54:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59383 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KOv48-00052w-ES for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:53:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KOv3A-0004Bb-Sa for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:52:08 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KOv39-00048q-9v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:52:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=59104 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KOv38-00048H-Lb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:52:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout7.012.net.il ([84.95.2.19]:36660) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KOv33-00081r-Cu; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:52:01 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.228.238]) by i-mtaout7.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0K4X00CEBD5Y19F0@i-mtaout7.012.net.il>; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 16:51:35 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <48930CE4.5080305@gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (1203?) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:101884 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 14:17:24 +0100 > From: Jason Rumney > Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Kenichi Handa wrote: > > In article <48907856.6040308@gnu.org>, Jason Rumney writes: > > >> And why does that character have a category of h:Korean > >> j:Japanese? > > > > That character is surely included in Korean charset ksc5601 > > and Japanese charset jisx0208, and all such characters > > belongs to cateogories "h" and "j" (set in characters.el). > > But is that the right way to categorize them? This character (and others > around it) are not Japanese or Korean characters. They just happen to be > included in those encodings. The same goes for Cyrillic and Greek > characters. I agree with Jason. I reported a similar curiosity the moment the unicode-2 branch was merged with the trunk.