From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: PURESIZE increased (again)
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 08:29:51 +0300
Message-ID: <uu08efesw.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <ur73yyp4g.fsf@gnu.org> <87lku5u6tx.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com>
	<jek69pogzf.fsf@sykes.suse.de> <umzelzcbg.fsf@gnu.org>
	<v9ejzsb36t.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> <uwtdkulm9.fsf@gnu.org>
	<v9odyw2c54.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> <ulktzv07f.fsf@gnu.org>
	<v9fyk0o38r.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> <u1wvihhya.fsf@gnu.org>
	<16F5541A-23E7-473C-A4D5-61E3B6930526@raeburn.org>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1146202216 24011 80.91.229.2 (28 Apr 2006 05:30:16 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 05:30:16 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 28 07:30:14 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FZLYM-0005Nr-Fg
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 07:30:06 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FZLYL-0006uV-OR
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 01:30:05 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FZLY6-0006tu-Ov
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 01:29:50 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FZLY4-0006tf-Oz
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 01:29:49 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FZLY4-0006tZ-IL
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 01:29:48 -0400
Original-Received: from [192.114.186.20] (helo=nitzan.inter.net.il)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FZLb8-0001qy-MB
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 01:32:58 -0400
Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-83-130-215-212.inter.net.il
	[83.130.215.212]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA)
	with ESMTP id DFP92611 (AUTH halo1);
	Fri, 28 Apr 2006 08:29:43 +0300 (IDT)
Original-To: Ken Raeburn <raeburn@raeburn.org>
In-reply-to: <16F5541A-23E7-473C-A4D5-61E3B6930526@raeburn.org> (message from
	Ken Raeburn on Thu, 27 Apr 2006 18:24:55 -0400)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:53539
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/53539>

> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> From: Ken Raeburn <raeburn@raeburn.org>
> Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 18:24:55 -0400
> 
> The byte and object counts *should* be the same (uh, unless the  
> pathnames to the elc files are stored somewhere but el file pathnames  
> are not).

Even if this is true (which I don't think it is), how can a stored
name explain 20KB of difference?

> It might also be useful to check that the .elc files you two are
> getting (you've both done "make bootstrap", right?) are actually
> similar.

That's the point: how _could_ they be different?