From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bug Database? Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 22:33:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: <17717.20433.183356.106695@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17718.15996.727727.91417@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17719.20082.610297.834477@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17719.55331.655678.827341@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17720.36925.992861.58347@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1161382471 12146 80.91.229.2 (20 Oct 2006 22:14:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 22:14:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: nickrob@snap.net.nz, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 21 00:14:27 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gb2dE-0003rA-C2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Oct 2006 00:14:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gb2dD-0001fb-Nm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 18:14:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gb13I-0005wt-9Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 16:33:12 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gb13D-0005qI-Ew for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 16:33:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gb13D-0005q2-7u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 16:33:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.20] (helo=nitzan.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Gb136-00035N-BB; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 16:33:00 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-83-130-249-140.inter.net.il [83.130.249.140]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id EYV41837 (AUTH halo1); Fri, 20 Oct 2006 22:32:57 +0200 (IST) Original-To: Frank Schmitt In-reply-to: (message from Frank Schmitt on Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:01:31 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:60967 Archived-At: > From: Frank Schmitt > Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:01:31 +0200 > Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > What I wanted to state is: A free project (especially if it doesn't have > any capable free competitors (like gcc, gdb, the Linux kernel, to a > lesser degree Mozilla)) has a responsibility to deliver code which > fulfills the promises regarding functionality the project makes. Gdb > states that it "allows you to see what is going on `inside' another > program while it executes" and that "The program being debugged can be > written in C, C++, Pascal, Objective-C (and many other languages)". And it fulfills that promise. But what on Earth does all this have to do with an Emacs bug database issue???