From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Fwd: Loading ebrowse file yields warning Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2007 21:37:14 +0200 Message-ID: References: <0wve9jmm3s.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1191785860 14897 80.91.229.12 (7 Oct 2007 19:37:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 19:37:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 07 21:37:37 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IebwQ-0002mv-MN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 07 Oct 2007 21:37:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IebwL-00051x-3c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 07 Oct 2007 15:37:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IebwI-00051r-9f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Oct 2007 15:37:22 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IebwG-00051f-SN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Oct 2007 15:37:20 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IebwG-00051c-Kw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Oct 2007 15:37:20 -0400 Original-Received: from heller.inter.net.il ([213.8.233.23]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IebwC-0000cw-EE; Sun, 07 Oct 2007 15:37:16 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-229-203-227.inter.net.il [84.229.203.227]) by heller.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id DUJ28053 (AUTH halo1); Sun, 7 Oct 2007 21:37:14 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <0wve9jmm3s.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (message from Glenn Morris on Sun, 07 Oct 2007 03:15:35 -0400) X-Detected-Kernel: FreeBSD 4.7-5.2 (or MacOS X 10.2-10.4) (2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:80390 Archived-At: > From: Glenn Morris > Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2007 03:15:35 -0400 > Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, Richard Stallman > > Richard Stallman wrote: > > > If these buffers are "internal", should they be hidden (which would > > turn off undo)? > > > > I don't know enough about ebrowse to have an answer. > > My question was addressed to the list. I was/am hoping that people who > use ebrowse/etags will comment on whether they ever actually need to > look at the BROWSE/TAGS buffers. Sorry, I don't understand the question. To use the C++ class browser, one starts by visiting the file BROWSE (created in advance, e.g., by running the `ebrowse' utility outside Emacs). When you visit that file, you get a buffer called "*Tree*" which visits that BROWSE file. There's no buffer named BROWSE (or at least I don't see one; am I missing something?). This is in contrast to tags tables, where the table is visited by a special buffer whose name is TAGS. Are you talking about this *Tree* buffer? If so, the user certainly needs to look at it, since that's the buffer that displays the class hierarchy.