From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bootstrap compiles C files twice Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2008 06:12:21 +0300 Message-ID: References: <4844F8E0.9080701@gnu.org> <1pbq2i17sh.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1212635616 15404 80.91.229.12 (5 Jun 2008 03:13:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 03:13:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, jasonr@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 05 05:14:18 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K45vc-0000rK-Bb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2008 05:14:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53678 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K45up-0005M1-Nw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2008 23:13:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K45um-0005Lw-0Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2008 23:13:24 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K45uk-0005Lk-GM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2008 23:13:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60847 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K45uk-0005Lh-B4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2008 23:13:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout1.012.net.il ([84.95.2.1]:33051) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K45ub-0003Pw-4q; Wed, 04 Jun 2008 23:13:13 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([83.130.2.23]) by i-mtaout1.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0K1Z00J8409GJH31@i-mtaout1.012.net.il>; Thu, 05 Jun 2008 06:27:17 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9.1 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:98446 Archived-At: > From: Glenn Morris > Cc: jasonr@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 15:20:31 -0400 > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > No, I meant that perhaps Makefile.in was doing for six years two > > compilations for a good reason. > > I'm sorry, I can't understand this. Sorry for being unclear. I meant to say that there might be a good reason for compiling the sources twice, and that understanding how and why did we get rid of the -DPURESIZE= switch on the first of these two compilations might help us understand that good reason, or realize that there isn't one.