From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Terminology in multi-tty primitives Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 21:05:58 +0200 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1230750456 21404 80.91.229.12 (31 Dec 2008 19:07:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 19:07:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, stephen@xemacs.org, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 31 20:08:43 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LI6Qr-0004mg-S3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 31 Dec 2008 20:08:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42312 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LI6Pe-0002JS-2J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:07:26 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LI6OW-0001zg-3N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:06:16 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LI6OV-0001zB-55 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:06:15 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=32854 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LI6OU-0001z5-S2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:06:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout1.012.net.il ([84.95.2.1]:59569) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LI6OQ-0005dv-QI; Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:06:11 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout1.012.net.il by i-mtaout1.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KCR0020094G0900@i-mtaout1.012.net.il>; Wed, 31 Dec 2008 21:08:39 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.220.202]) by i-mtaout1.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KCR0088H96CBH30@i-mtaout1.012.net.il>; Wed, 31 Dec 2008 21:08:38 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9.1 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:107474 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: stephen@xemacs.org, eliz@gnu.org, cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 12:22:44 -0500 > > > By the way, why does it need the conditional that tests window-system? > > Should the proper handling of window-system be built into `make-frame' > > instead? If it is needed for all frame creation on MSDOG, putting it > > in `make-frame' is best because that way it only needs to be done once > > and callers are all simpler. > > My thought exactly, Could you two please explain the details of your thoughts? The original make-frame-on-tty, before I added the `pc' condition, did this: (make-frame `((window-system . nil) (tty . ,tty) (tty-type . ,type) . ,parameters)))) Now, what do you want to change exactly, and which part do you want to move to make-frame?