From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: configure-more.zip Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 18:14:46 +0200 Message-ID: References: <42C65DE9.6010703@student.lu.se> <42C795E3.7070702@student.lu.se> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1120404199 2881 80.91.229.2 (3 Jul 2005 15:23:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2005 15:23:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, jasonr@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 03 17:23:06 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dp6I4-0007ZX-EE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 17:21:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dp6JE-0006oN-Gq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 11:23:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Dp6I2-0006Kg-KW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 11:21:51 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Dp6Hu-0006EE-7F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 11:21:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dp6Ht-00069J-PN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 11:21:41 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.66] (helo=romy.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Dp6Gy-0005us-As; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 11:20:45 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-163-91.inter.net.il [84.228.163.91]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.8-GR) with ESMTP id BSY25487 (AUTH halo1); Sun, 3 Jul 2005 18:14:48 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: Lennart Borgman In-reply-to: <42C795E3.7070702@student.lu.se> (message from Lennart Borgman on Sun, 03 Jul 2005 09:38:11 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:40216 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:40216 > Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 09:38:11 +0200 > From: Lennart Borgman > CC: Jason Rumney , emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Running a bat file with unix style line ends: > > - cmd.exe: Windows 2k: ok, XP: ok, NT: ok > - command.com: Window 2k: ok, others: ?? The only shell I know of that chokes on Unix-style EOLs in batch files is command.com from Windows 9x and older (i.e. MS-DOS). I never tested any of the older shells with several CRs before the LF, so I don't know what would happen. > As I previously have said I suggested testing at the end of > configure.bat should be a good solution. All that is needed is a small C > program. Maybe this testing also should be repeated in the Makefile > though to take care of redownloads. I still don't understand what is wrong with testing _only_ during the build. What am I missing?