From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: old bootstrap error emerges again Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 19:58:14 +0000 Message-ID: References: <8764mcrmjz.fsf@emacsfans.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1143316825 6677 80.91.229.2 (25 Mar 2006 20:00:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 20:00:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 25 21:00:19 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FNEvh-0002fK-2W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 21:00:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FNEvg-0001Dz-Fl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 15:00:08 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FNEvQ-0001Dk-Ct for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 14:59:52 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FNEvP-0001DV-Od for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 14:59:51 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FNEvN-0001DD-BP; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 14:59:49 -0500 Original-Received: from [194.106.33.237] (helo=outmail.freedom2surf.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1FNEwR-0006hF-TN; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 15:00:56 -0500 Original-Received: from wanchan.jasonrumney.net (i-83-67-23-108.freedom2surf.net [83.67.23.108]) by outmail.freedom2surf.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k2PJxi5K008290; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 19:59:44 GMT Original-Received: from TONKOTSU-RAMEN (tonkotsu-ramen.jasonrumney.net [10.0.0.28]) by wanchan.jasonrumney.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA6AF32; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 19:59:43 +0000 (GMT) Original-To: Dieter Deyke In-Reply-To: (Dieter Deyke's message of "Sat, 25 Mar 2006 11:07:39 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (windows-nt) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:52052 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:11465 Archived-At: > Eli Zaretskii writes: > >> 390 if (SUBRP (fun)) >> (gdb) >> 392 if (XSUBR (fun)->doc == 0) >> (gdb) >> 409 return Qnil; >> (gdb) >> 477 } >> (gdb) Dieter Deyke writes: > 390 if (SUBRP (fun)) > (gdb) > 392 if (XSUBR (fun)->doc == 0) > (gdb) > 394 else if ((EMACS_INT) XSUBR (fun)->doc >= 0) Could it be that we are not explicitly setting doc to 0, and Dieter's compiler is initializing its memory with something other than 0 to detect this type of bug?