From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Why I can't use `info' in emacs? Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 06:12:38 +0200 Message-ID: References: <458268D7.6020203@163.com> <1166191335.058714.266970@80g2000cwy.googlegroups.com> <1166206305.278573.25520@n67g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> <5qlkl7cw3z.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: dough.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1166328777 19199 80.91.229.10 (17 Dec 2006 04:12:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 04:12:57 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 17 05:12:56 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GvnOO-0005oI-PG for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Dec 2006 05:12:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GvnOO-0002rY-0n for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 23:12:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GvnOC-0002rN-Gw for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 23:12:40 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GvnO8-0002oj-1w for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 23:12:40 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GvnO7-0002og-RK for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 23:12:35 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.66] (helo=romy.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GvnO7-0006ec-EZ for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 23:12:35 -0500 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-229-210-160.inter.net.il [84.229.210.160]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id GOD50622 (AUTH halo1); Sun, 17 Dec 2006 06:12:33 +0200 (IST) Original-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org In-reply-to: <5qlkl7cw3z.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Hadron Quark on Sat, 16 Dec 2006 23:30:08 +0100) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:39653 Archived-At: > From: Hadron Quark > Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 23:30:08 +0100 > > Again : Did you *read* the excerpts I posted coming up from the code? As a first > page context help, the man page is superior to the info file node which > first appears. From a programming perspective. Here it is again : Instead of insisting that the superiority is obvious, why don't you tell what you, from your programming perspective, expect to find when you ask the help system about a function? Then, if that information is missing from the glibc manual, perhaps some day it will be added. If you keep insisting that it's obvious, one thing is certain: the manual will never be changed to your liking. Maybe that is your goal...