From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New pretest tarball 22.0.93 Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 17:42:57 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87hcuia6c4.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1169826196 10604 80.91.229.12 (26 Jan 2007 15:43:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 15:43:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Juanma Barranquero" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 26 16:43:13 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HATEO-0004Sc-Hq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 16:43:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HATEN-0007Me-Vz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 10:43:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HATED-0007MZ-AB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 10:43:01 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HATE9-0007MH-Ln for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 10:43:00 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HATE9-0007ME-JK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 10:42:57 -0500 Original-Received: from heller.inter.net.il ([213.8.233.23]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HATE9-0007E0-1h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 10:42:57 -0500 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-20-29.inter.net.il [80.230.20.29]) by heller.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id BSG79608 (AUTH halo1); Fri, 26 Jan 2007 17:42:50 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: (lekktu@gmail.com) X-detected-kernel: FreeBSD 4.7-5.2 (or MacOS X 10.2-10.4) (2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:65490 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 16:22:12 +0100 > From: "Juanma Barranquero" > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > Emacs 22.1 doesn't come anywhere near that revolution. > > Sure. And yet, we're already 91 days into the pretest. 4 pretest tarballs is not too many, I think. > > No. > > Well, that's not gonna make things faster ;-) I wonder on how many platforms was this pretest built and tested. I don't think we have that information; during the pretest of Emacs 21, I think many pretesters would send email short time after another pretest was tarred, saying they have the new version up and running. Perhaps we should ask them to provide this information now. Otherwise, we really have no idea how well the pretest is tested, in comparison to how the CVS code normally is.