From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 22:43:47 +0200 Message-ID: References: <85tzxazb8r.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1172609071 28902 80.91.229.12 (27 Feb 2007 20:44:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 20:44:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 27 21:44:21 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HM9BM-0000sU-Vt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:44:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HM9BM-0005OQ-QU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 15:44:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HM9BA-0005L2-F1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 15:44:08 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HM9B8-0005J7-M9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 15:44:07 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HM9B8-0005It-H3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 15:44:06 -0500 Original-Received: from romy.inter.net.il ([213.8.233.24]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HM9B6-0002rF-Cj; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 15:44:04 -0500 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-163-35.inter.net.il [80.230.163.35]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id HGD78316 (AUTH halo1); Tue, 27 Feb 2007 22:43:43 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: (message from Richard Stallman on Tue, 27 Feb 2007 02:39:15 -0500) X-detected-kernel: FreeBSD 4.7-5.2 (or MacOS X 10.2-10.4) (2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:66947 Archived-At: > From: Richard Stallman > CC: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 02:39:15 -0500 > > > The motive for stealth fontification was to avoid delays when moving to > > another part of the file. Is fontification now sufficiently fast > > that such delays are not much of an annoyance any more? > > No, we are definitely not there yet, IMO. > > Would you please tell us more? What sort of machine are you using, > and how bad are these delays? We need to compare them with the delays > caused by stealth fontification. I was talking from memory. I will make some measurements in a few days and tell the results.