From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Word syntax question Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 19:21:29 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87mygy0ybq.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87bpxd29ft.fsf@catnip.gol.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1224609817 18376 80.91.229.12 (21 Oct 2008 17:23:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:23:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: schwab@suse.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Miles Bader Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 21 19:24:35 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KsKxf-00076C-8X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 19:24:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43816 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KsKwZ-0004ef-DG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 13:22:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KsKw2-0004S9-VW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 13:22:23 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KsKw2-0004Rj-2p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 13:22:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36227 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KsKw1-0004Rc-U4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 13:22:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout4.012.net.il ([84.95.2.10]:55266) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KsKw0-0002eU-7k; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 13:22:20 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.98.197]) by i_mtaout4.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0K9300H3XMY4ZN10@i_mtaout4.012.net.il>; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 19:22:53 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87bpxd29ft.fsf@catnip.gol.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9.1 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:104761 Archived-At: > From: Miles Bader > Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 01:35:02 +0900 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Andreas Schwab writes: > > See char-script-table, forward-word also stops at a script boundary. > > That seems kind of broken in this case -- it's quite common for > "phonetic" characters to be intermixed in a word with latin characters, > and certainly nobody thinks of those boundaries as being word > boundaries. I agree. I think we should introduce a user option to control whether it stops on script boundaries or not, because sometimes it makes sense, sometimes it doesn't.