From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Patch queue management systems Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 09:59:28 +0100 Organization: Probably a good idea Message-ID: References: <546D2E75.6090701@cs.ucla.edu> <837fyp7tvi.fsf@gnu.org> <546E2899.4050702@cs.ucla.edu> <54756754.5090103@cs.ucla.edu> <54762721.4060908@cs.ucla.edu> <17zjb2h650.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <86mw71pl6d.fsf@yandex.ru> <83fvct145r.fsf@gnu.org> <5486F304.9030101@yandex.ru> <83iohkwy0p.fsf@gnu.org> <54872EA6.9090405@yandex.ru> <83egs8wwr6.fsf@gnu.org> <87r3w7a7sr.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1418288403 22509 80.91.229.3 (11 Dec 2014 09:00:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 09:00:03 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 11 09:59:56 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XyzbG-00041f-TS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 09:59:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49855 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XyzbG-0007vv-96 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 03:59:54 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33991) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xyzay-0007vZ-DJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 03:59:42 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xyzaq-0005Y3-AS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 03:59:36 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:49475) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xyzaq-0005Xt-42 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 03:59:28 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xyzap-0003mJ-7m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 09:59:27 +0100 Original-Received: from 155.55.49.12 ([155.55.49.12]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 09:59:27 +0100 Original-Received: from sb by 155.55.49.12 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 09:59:27 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 13 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 155.55.49.12 Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/24.3 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:NEQS04c5JTB1Q9iup+YeudWCt/0= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:179727 Archived-At: >>>>> Ted Zlatanov : > It could be more fine-grained, only protecting certain branches > (master, emacs-*, etc.). Then people can push to "username/feature" > branches and maintainers can merge into a protected branch. "username/feature" sounds like a good naming scheme and one that could cut down on the inevitable clutter (implicit blame). (and I still think having a separate feature branch git repository is a good idea. If that repository resides on the same server and is created with hardlinks to the real repo, it should also be cheap disk-usage-wise, at least initially....)