From: Jason Rumney <jasonr@gnu.org>
Cc: Stefan Monnier <monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu>
Subject: Re: a few MULE criticisms
Date: 15 May 2003 07:55:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <uptmkaecw.fsf@jasonrumney.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3EC2F56B.1000503@yahoo.co.uk>
Hin-Tak Leung <hintak_leung@yahoo.co.uk> writes:
> I haven't had any experience with i18n support in X nor
> localised X, but I heard that they are somewhat usable. The
> advantage of that approach is that it is available to all
> X-clients (browsers, terminal emulators, editors). As I
> previously said out, my main criticism of using MULE is that
> it can't suggest the next character by association or by
> fuzzy match. The same criticism doesn't seem to apply to
> i18n X support - some l10n X or i18n X system indeed ships
> large dictionaries with the system.
Then Emacs can also take advantage of these, since it supports X
input methods, as well as running under cxterm and similar terminal
emulators. So you can forget about leim, it is just a fallback for
when better input methods are not already provided by the environment
you are running in.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-15 6:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-14 20:03 a few MULE criticisms, cemacs, & current emacs segfaults by changes in GNU ld Hin-Tak Leung
2003-05-14 20:55 ` Jason Rumney
2003-05-14 22:05 ` a few MULE criticisms Hin-Tak Leung
2003-05-14 21:55 ` a few MULE criticisms, cemacs, & current emacs segfaults by changes in GNU ld Stefan Monnier
2003-05-15 2:03 ` a few MULE criticisms Hin-Tak Leung
2003-05-15 6:55 ` Jason Rumney [this message]
2003-05-15 1:18 ` a few MULE criticisms, cemacs, & current emacs segfaults by changes in GNU ld Kenichi Handa
2003-05-15 1:39 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-05-15 3:29 ` a few MULE criticisms Hin-Tak Leung
2003-05-15 10:06 ` Hin-Tak Leung
2003-05-15 15:51 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2003-05-15 19:49 ` Hin-Tak Leung
2003-05-15 21:29 ` Kevin Rodgers
2003-05-16 7:09 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2003-05-16 11:43 ` Hin-Tak Leung
2003-05-17 7:32 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2003-05-17 19:40 ` Hin-Tak Leung
2003-05-15 7:03 ` a few MULE criticisms, cemacs, & current emacs segfaults by changes in GNU ld Stephen J. Turnbull
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-18 5:23 a few MULE criticisms Stefan Monnier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=uptmkaecw.fsf@jasonrumney.net \
--to=jasonr@gnu.org \
--cc=monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.