From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Entering filenames with spaces
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 06:48:57 +0300
Message-ID: <upsshmb4m.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <DNEMKBNJBGPAOPIJOOICEEJLCLAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
	<E1E3xBa-0003fJ-3T@fencepost.gnu.org>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1123991760 13128 80.91.229.2 (14 Aug 2005 03:56:00 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 03:56:00 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 14 05:55:58 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1E49a1-0006z5-9p
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 05:54:37 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1E49dJ-0006u7-LV
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 23:58:01 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1E49cm-0006qx-24
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 23:57:28 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1E49cc-0006lj-R6
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 23:57:20 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E49cc-0006kT-5C
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 23:57:18 -0400
Original-Received: from [192.114.186.20] (helo=nitzan.inter.net.il)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1E49jY-0006YA-3x; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 00:04:28 -0400
Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-83-130-205-228.inter.net.il
	[83.130.205.228]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.6.5-GR)
	with ESMTP id BDK49985 (AUTH halo1);
	Sun, 14 Aug 2005 06:48:58 +0300 (IDT)
Original-To: rms@gnu.org
In-reply-to: <E1E3xBa-0003fJ-3T@fencepost.gnu.org> (rms@gnu.org)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:42018
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:42018

> From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
> Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 10:40:34 -0400
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> 
> However, I tend to think that the completion definition is not
> essential, and is better for advanced users, while it can screw
> beginners who don't know enough to use C-q SPC.  Therefore,
> I have concluded we should redefine SPC.

Please, let's have an option that would turn off this new behavior and
revert to the old one.  (It could be initially off, i.e. the new
behavior could be the default.)  I'm sure there are people who will be
pissed off by this change.