From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mathias Dahl Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: tumme directory Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 11:33:42 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87r76t8afw.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1138828691 17969 80.91.229.2 (1 Feb 2006 21:18:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 21:18:11 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 01 22:18:06 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F4PLy-000145-HT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 22:17:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F4POk-0008Gy-2w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 16:20:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F4Mqt-00083l-KJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 13:37:12 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F4Kcy-0003ah-Bu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 11:14:43 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F4FKt-0004P5-7y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 05:35:40 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1F4FJW-0007TP-Gk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 05:34:14 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1F4FHd-0006DA-SZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 11:32:17 +0100 Original-Received: from user.ifsab.se ([193.41.170.225]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 11:32:17 +0100 Original-Received: from brakjoller by user.ifsab.se with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 11:32:17 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 13 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: user.ifsab.se User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:IT2w24nZZl+faLVHZsalEkbkx10= X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:49876 Archived-At: "Richard M. Stallman" writes: > > It should follow the usual convention of using .emacs.d > > if it exists, etc., the same way other uses of .emacs.d do. > > Does that mean that we should accept Chong's fix? I know too little > about how .emacs.d is used. > > We should install a change to use .emacs.d > in accord with the standard conventions for using it. Okay, than I guess I have to read up on what this standard is. Or, maybe someone here will tell me... :)