From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs doc changes Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 12:15:45 +0300 Message-ID: References: <17469.29694.605871.59144@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <17469.53282.265431.557135@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <4nd5flnwtg.fsf@asimov.bwh.harvard.edu> <4nek002s4h.fsf@asimov.bwh.harvard.edu> <4nodz4ywgg.fsf@asimov.bwh.harvard.edu> <4nejzv9b98.fsf@asimov.bwh.harvard.edu> <4n7j5l5xt6.fsf_-_@asimov.bwh.harvard.edu> <85fyk9fnxv.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1145524600 16056 80.91.229.2 (20 Apr 2006 09:16:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 09:16:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: tzz@lifelogs.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 20 11:16:34 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FWVH0-0005pY-FX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 11:16:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FWVGy-0004Q1-VN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 05:16:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FWVGX-0004IU-IH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 05:15:57 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FWVGU-0004HU-VN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 05:15:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FWVGU-0004HM-KC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 05:15:54 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.20] (helo=nitzan.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FWVHi-0007R8-Cv; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 05:17:10 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-8-103.inter.net.il [80.230.8.103]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id DEA42088 (AUTH halo1); Thu, 20 Apr 2006 12:15:39 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: David Kastrup In-reply-to: <85fyk9fnxv.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup on Wed, 19 Apr 2006 19:57:32 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:53127 Archived-At: > Cc: Ted Zlatanov , emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: David Kastrup > Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 19:57:32 +0200 > > Is there a reason not to use unified diffs ("diff -u") when available? AFAIK, only one: that Richard asks for "diff -c".