From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: PURESIZE increased (again) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 13:13:40 +0300 Message-ID: References: <87lku5u6tx.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> <200604212310.k3LNA3Jp018780@jane.dms.auburn.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1145700842 24729 80.91.229.2 (22 Apr 2006 10:14:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 10:14:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: romain@orebokech.com, Reiner.Steib@gmx.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 22 12:14:00 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FXF7l-0003IW-Gl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2006 12:13:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FXF7l-00044h-3X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2006 06:13:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FXF7Y-00044E-Tv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2006 06:13:44 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FXF7X-00043x-54 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2006 06:13:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FXF7W-00043u-Nj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2006 06:13:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.20] (helo=nitzan.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FXF9H-00085b-Af for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2006 06:15:31 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-83-130-212-1.inter.net.il [83.130.212.1]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id DEJ01201 (AUTH halo1); Sat, 22 Apr 2006 13:13:39 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: Luc Teirlinck In-reply-to: <200604212310.k3LNA3Jp018780@jane.dms.auburn.edu> (message from Luc Teirlinck on Fri, 21 Apr 2006 18:10:03 -0500 (CDT)) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:53224 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 18:10:03 -0500 (CDT) > From: Luc Teirlinck > CC: eliz@gnu.org, romain@orebokech.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Reiner Steib wrote: > > I also get the "Pure space overflow" warning from > `fancy-splash-screens-1': > > I also get the "Pure space overflow" warning on 32 bit GNU/Linux, with > freshly downloaded CVS. Any reason not to increase PURESIZE to get > rid of this problem? I increased it by 5K, but could you please post your data of pure[] usage similar to what I posted here yesterday? I think we simply _must_ understand why on similar systems the numbers are so different (with today's CVS, I'm still 7KB short of the limit before the 5K increase). I don't like solutions to problems we don't understand well enough, it looks like kludging around the problem instead of solving it. TIA