From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 22:48:41 +0200 Message-ID: References: <85tzxazb8r.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85ps7wovzt.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1172609432 30370 80.91.229.12 (27 Feb 2007 20:50:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 20:50:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 27 21:50:20 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HM9H9-0003R9-Lj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:50:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HM9H9-0008Vj-5v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 15:50:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HM9Gl-0008Lg-Iy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 15:49:55 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HM9Gj-0008Kj-Mn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 15:49:54 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HM9Gj-0008Kb-E8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 15:49:53 -0500 Original-Received: from heller.inter.net.il ([213.8.233.23]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HM9Gh-0003v6-J8; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 15:49:51 -0500 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-163-35.inter.net.il [80.230.163.35]) by heller.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id BZJ52652 (AUTH halo1); Tue, 27 Feb 2007 22:48:30 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <85ps7wovzt.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup on Tue, 27 Feb 2007 09:17:10 +0100) X-detected-kernel: FreeBSD 4.7-5.2 (or MacOS X 10.2-10.4) (2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:66950 Archived-At: > From: David Kastrup > Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 09:17:10 +0100 > Cc: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > > The motive for stealth fontification was to avoid delays when moving > > to another part of the file. > > That is the motive for jit-font-lock, but stealth fontification > fontifies _other_ buffers. While it may also hit the current buffer, > this is not a priority as far as I can tell. The current buffer does not need to be a priority because no one says that the user works only (or mainly) in a single buffer. I'm as likely to go to the end of another buffer as I am in the one where I do my edits.