From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Lost antialias? Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 12:00:03 +0300 Message-ID: References: <485230EB.9070203@alice.it> <48546807.8010406@alice.it> <87abhmgmko.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87abhkndo9.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87skv7d6sa.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87lk0z1w3e.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87ej6rpqh0.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87abhf1mxe.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <874p7n1jb9.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <878wwzmg2j.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87ve03kx7d.fsf@catnip.gol.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1214038856 18424 80.91.229.12 (21 Jun 2008 09:00:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 09:00:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, handa@m17n.org To: Miles Bader Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 21 11:01:40 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K9yyR-0002Gn-8S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Jun 2008 11:01:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51606 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K9yxc-000276-Ct for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Jun 2008 05:00:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K9yxU-00026l-PH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jun 2008 05:00:32 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K9yxT-00026Q-15 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jun 2008 05:00:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52112 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K9yxS-00026N-SC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jun 2008 05:00:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout4.012.net.il ([84.95.2.10]:29902) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K9yxI-00072M-0Y; Sat, 21 Jun 2008 05:00:20 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.217.57]) by i_mtaout4.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0K2T00I0331EPGG3@i_mtaout4.012.net.il>; Sat, 21 Jun 2008 12:15:14 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <87ve03kx7d.fsf@catnip.gol.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9.1 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:99595 Archived-At: > From: Miles Bader > Cc: handa@m17n.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 17:29:26 +0900 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > >> It's fontconfig that does it, not Emacs. > > > > But Emacs calls it, doesn't it? So we could set up things for the > > results to be consistent across LANG settings, if we decide that to be > > TRT. > > I don't necessarily disagree with that, but the question is whether such > an effort to "be consistent" would incur too much cost -- for instance, > inconsistency with other modern apps, or ignoring user-specified global > settings. > > I think that Stefan has a good point when he says we should rely on > existing mechanisms to the extent that they work acceptably. > > I'd like to know what e.g., Gnome apps do in this case 100% agreement. That's precisely why I asked in my original mail how do other GUI applications behave wrt LANG settings.