From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Moving to bzr? Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:35:19 +0200 Message-ID: References: <871vviif6s.fsf@xemacs.org> <87mye6xnsr.fsf@xemacs.org> <87y6xpvyz6.fsf@xemacs.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1231274158 11904 80.91.229.12 (6 Jan 2009 20:35:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 20:35:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 06 21:37:09 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LKIfb-0000lW-WB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Jan 2009 21:37:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57990 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LKIeM-0007G5-88 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:35:42 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LKIeH-0007FX-4G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:35:37 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LKIeG-0007FL-FR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:35:36 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=59781 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LKIeG-0007FI-B9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:35:36 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout6.012.net.il ([84.95.2.16]:25099) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LKIeF-0004As-UI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:35:36 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout6.012.net.il by i-mtaout6.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KD200M00GHP8400@i-mtaout6.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:35:20 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.238.249]) by i-mtaout6.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KD2009JLH6O7L90@i-mtaout6.012.net.il>; Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:35:13 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87y6xpvyz6.fsf@xemacs.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (1203?) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:107654 Archived-At: > From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" > Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:29:33 +0900 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Stefan Monnier writes: > > > I don't think comparison to CVS or Subversion update is relevant, > > > > In the context of whether or not to switch from CVS to Bzr, it is the > > only relevant comparison. > > Urk. I thought the rules of the game were that that decision has been > made? The decision to move to bzr was made, but the decision when to move was not.