From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Joe Casadonte" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: lisp performace question: how efficent are (long) list parameters? Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 11:50:23 -0500 Organization: Llama Fresh Farms, Neare Paraguay Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1073754130 12366 80.91.224.253 (10 Jan 2004 17:02:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 17:02:10 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 10 18:02:07 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AfMUw-0006LJ-00 for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 18:02:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AfNQX-0002gt-Ke for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 13:01:37 -0500 Original-Path: shelby.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!cyclone.bc.net!tdsnet-transit!newspeer.tds.net!diablo.voicenet.com!newshosting.com!news-xfer1.atl.newshosting.com!posted2.newshosting.com!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.1 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:dqPiCoHxTkjPYnMv2R4hnglhIZQ= Original-Lines: 22 Original-X-Complaints-To: abuse@newshosting.com Original-Xref: shelby.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:119960 Original-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:15902 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help:15902 On 11 Jan 2004, leo@bella.local wrote: > so, what is more effiecent? Run them each 1000 times and time them. That should tell you for sure. -- Regards, joe Joe Casadonte jcasadonte@northbound-train.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Llama Fresh Farms => http://www.northbound-train.com Gay Media Resource List => http://www.northbound-train.com/gaymedia.html Perl for Win32 => http://www.northbound-train.com/perlwin32.html Emacs Stuff => http://www.northbound-train.com/emacs.html Music CD Trading => http://www.northbound-train.com/cdr.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Free, that's the message! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------