From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: PURESIZE increased (again) Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 10:18:38 +0300 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1145171937 15978 80.91.229.2 (16 Apr 2006 07:18:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 07:18:57 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 16 09:18:55 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FV1X4-0004c4-1w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2006 09:18:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FV1X3-0007Rk-Eb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2006 03:18:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FV1Wp-0007RI-Nu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2006 03:18:39 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FV1Wp-0007R2-7w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2006 03:18:39 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FV1Wp-0007Qz-5p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2006 03:18:39 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.66] (helo=romy.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FV1XC-0001Gq-Dx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2006 03:19:02 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-83-130-209-130.inter.net.il [83.130.209.130]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id DZI39942 (AUTH halo1); Sun, 16 Apr 2006 10:18:37 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-reply-to: (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sun, 16 Apr 2006 10:07:59 +0300) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:52916 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 10:07:59 +0300 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Judging by "cvs log", BASE_PURESIZE went up by 100,000 since last > October, whereas before that it kept its value for 2 years without any > changes. Perhaps we should consider each such change more carefully. For that matter, could someone (Richard?) tell what are the thumb rules for estimating the required value of SYSTEM_PURESIZE_EXTRA (other than by trial and error)? Will the combined size of system-specific *.el/*.elc files loaded by loadup.el be a good start, or are there any additional bits to take into consideration? (I'm asking because I suspect that the value of SYSTEM_PURESIZE_EXTRA could be exaggerated as well, at least on Windows.)