From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: PURESIZE increased (again) Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 19:49:41 +0300 Message-ID: References: <87lku5u6tx.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1149871891 31113 80.91.229.2 (9 Jun 2006 16:51:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 16:51:31 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 09 18:51:26 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FokBK-0001Ju-5K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 18:49:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FokBJ-0003Vm-KN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 12:49:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FokB8-0003VZ-2u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 12:49:46 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FokB5-0003V5-9f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 12:49:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FokB5-0003V0-62 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 12:49:43 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.20] (helo=nitzan.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FokJA-0001bv-3U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 12:58:04 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-209-89.inter.net.il [80.230.209.89]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id DRD88369 (AUTH halo1); Fri, 9 Jun 2006 19:49:41 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-reply-to: (message from Reiner Steib on Fri, 09 Jun 2006 17:33:24 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:55794 Archived-At: > From: Reiner Steib > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 17:33:24 +0200 > > Attached you'll find the gzipped gdb log (from a fresh bootstrapped > build on 32-bit GNU/Linux). Thanks. Will look at it today or tomorrow. > BTW, the above is on SUSE 9.2. On SUSE 10.0 I don't observe an > overflow. I don't have gcc version of SUSE 10.0 here, but I can > provide it later if it's of interest. Please see whether the GCC versions are different (although I cannot yet see how a different version could explain such large differences). What is the GCC version on your SUSE 9.2? Can people who know about SUSE think of any differences between these two versions that could explain the difference in pure space usage?