From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Pretest
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 22:22:11 +0200
Message-ID: <uodruswi4.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87lkn1tzav.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
	<E1Gdsga-0004DC-5A@fencepost.gnu.org> <u3b98tgad.fsf@gnu.org>
	<E1GeFj5-0008F0-Rp@fencepost.gnu.org>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1162153420 10188 80.91.229.2 (29 Oct 2006 20:23:40 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 20:23:40 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 29 21:23:39 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GeHBf-0003wA-2D
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 21:23:20 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GeHBe-0003Pb-Ff
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 15:23:18 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GeHBC-0003K5-I4
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 15:22:50 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GeHBA-0003Fs-KY
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 15:22:49 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GeHB9-0003FB-Rh
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 15:22:48 -0500
Original-Received: from [192.114.186.20] (helo=nitzan.inter.net.il)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52)
	id 1GeHB8-0007Ra-SB; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 15:22:47 -0500
Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-154-241.inter.net.il
	[80.230.154.241]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA)
	with ESMTP id FAT11946 (AUTH halo1);
	Sun, 29 Oct 2006 22:22:12 +0200 (IST)
Original-To: rms@gnu.org
In-reply-to: <E1GeFj5-0008F0-Rp@fencepost.gnu.org> (message from Richard
	Stallman on Sun, 29 Oct 2006 13:49:43 -0500)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:61347
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/61347>

> From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
> CC: cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 13:49:43 -0500
> 
>     > I have a list of pretesters that I send the announcement to.  I keep
>     > it in sync with emacs-pretesters, but I don't send the announcement
>     > _to_ that mailing list, because that would tend to lead everyone to
>     > mail all their statements of success or failure to the list as well.
> 
>     Won't `Reply-to' solve this more conveniently?
> 
> I am not sure.  What would we put in the Reply-to field?

I think emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org is the right address to put there.