From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.auctex.devel,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: CVS repository synchronization for RefTeX Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 21:03:26 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87k60b7hv5.fsf@neutrino.caeruleus.net> <87sley46bb.fsf@neutrino.caeruleus.net> <87mz554e1u.fsf@neutrino.caeruleus.net> <87r6uh1alp.fsf@neutrino.caeruleus.net> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1167505421 16226 80.91.229.12 (30 Dec 2006 19:03:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 19:03:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: auctex-devel@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: auctex-devel-bounces+gead-auctex-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 30 20:03:39 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gead-auctex-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H0jUW-0006Do-7X for gead-auctex-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 20:03:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H0jUV-0006er-Pu for gead-auctex-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 14:03:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H0jUS-0006eI-8j for auctex-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 14:03:32 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H0jUQ-0006e5-KI for auctex-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 14:03:31 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H0jUQ-0006e0-Ew; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 14:03:30 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.66] (helo=romy.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1H0jUP-0008UX-QN; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 14:03:30 -0500 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-229-225-74.inter.net.il [84.229.225.74]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id GRF08081 (AUTH halo1); Sat, 30 Dec 2006 21:03:26 +0200 (IST) Original-To: Ralf Angeli In-reply-to: <87r6uh1alp.fsf@neutrino.caeruleus.net> (message from Ralf Angeli on Sat, 30 Dec 2006 19:50:58 +0100) X-BeenThere: auctex-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for AUCTeX developers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: auctex-devel-bounces+gead-auctex-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: auctex-devel-bounces+gead-auctex-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.auctex.devel:1482 gmane.emacs.devel:64519 Archived-At: > From: Ralf Angeli > Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 19:50:58 +0100 > Cc: auctex-devel@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, > Carsten Dominik > > * Eli Zaretskii (2006-12-30) writes: > > > Ralf said Emacs release cycle is too slow, but now you say that there > > are many RefTeX users that still use Emacs 21. This sounds like a > > contradiction to me. > > As Carsten wrote, RefTeX has been mainained outside of Emacs and seen > releases independent of Emacs ever since. So there currently is no > problem with the length of Emacs' release cycle. There would be a > problem, however, if one followed your suggestion not ot release > RefTeX independently of Emacs anymore. Sorry, but you are just reiterating the contradictory statement without explaining it.