From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Failure in building Emacs 23.0.50 on Cygwin Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2007 13:36:01 +0300 Message-ID: References: <20070901091956.1876@blackhawk> <200709010035.l810Zwni021513@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <20070901125313.1488@blackhawk> <20070901191415.3788@blackhawk> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1188642973 1573 80.91.229.12 (1 Sep 2007 10:36:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 10:36:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dann@ics.uci.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "d.henman" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 01 12:36:10 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IRQKn-0003Ta-OV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Sep 2007 12:36:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IRQKm-0005ko-S0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Sep 2007 06:36:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IRQKi-0005i3-Md for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Sep 2007 06:36:04 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IRQKh-0005fo-6S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Sep 2007 06:36:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IRQKg-0005fP-Ut for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Sep 2007 06:36:03 -0400 Original-Received: from romy.inter.net.il ([213.8.233.24]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IRQKg-0003z1-Gp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Sep 2007 06:36:02 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-59-157.inter.net.il [80.230.59.157]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id ITY26726 (AUTH halo1); Sat, 1 Sep 2007 13:35:53 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <20070901191415.3788@blackhawk> (dhenman@gmail.com) X-Detected-Kernel: FreeBSD 4.7-5.2 (or MacOS X 10.2-10.4) (2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:77544 Archived-At: > From: "d.henman" > Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2007 19:14:15 +0900 > Cc: "d. henman" ,, > > > I also feel that defining a "croak" for cygwin and all other platforms in sysdep.c is > a better one. > > After all that is what sysdep.c is for, I should think... > > But, I don't have sufficient knowledge at this point, other thatn to make it functionwith no processing thet simply returns a zero, for o.k. ??? Why not do what it does on other platforms (i.e. say "not implemented" and exit)? If exiting is somehow counterproductive, you could signal an error (which will throw to top level) instead.