From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Patch to allow -nw to runemacs on w32
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 06:40:09 +0200
Message-ID: <umz6sgg2e.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <455B19B9.9000004@student.lu.se> <uwt5whajh.fsf@gnu.org>
	<455B7307.4030207@student.lu.se> <455B88CA.4060703@gnu.org>
	<455B8E79.5060105@student.lu.se>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1163652035 29885 80.91.229.2 (16 Nov 2006 04:40:35 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 04:40:35 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, jasonr@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 16 05:40:33 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GkZ35-0002Gc-FE
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Nov 2006 05:40:27 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GkZ34-0000P0-E6
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Nov 2006 23:40:26 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GkZ2r-0000Ou-8q
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Nov 2006 23:40:13 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GkZ2p-0000OT-TM
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Nov 2006 23:40:12 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GkZ2p-0000OQ-Mt
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Nov 2006 23:40:11 -0500
Original-Received: from [192.114.186.66] (helo=romy.inter.net.il)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52)
	id 1GkZ2n-0000xl-O5; Wed, 15 Nov 2006 23:40:10 -0500
Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-70-204.inter.net.il
	[80.230.70.204]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA)
	with ESMTP id GGR12785 (AUTH halo1);
	Thu, 16 Nov 2006 06:40:00 +0200 (IST)
Original-To: Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se>
In-reply-to: <455B8E79.5060105@student.lu.se> (message from Lennart Borgman on
	Wed, 15 Nov 2006 23:02:33 +0100)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:62366
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/62366>

> Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 23:02:33 +0100
> From: Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se>
> CC: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,  emacs-devel@gnu.org
> 
> > The simplest way is emacs -nw. Why would they use runemacs? If they 
> > are used to running emacs -nw, then they would have learnt quickly 
> > that runemacs is not suitable.
> 
> I do not think "emacs -nw" will work in all situations.

When will it not work?