From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Reviewing changes Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:28:31 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87y6zggnmz.fsf@red-bean.com> <87d4grbcc0.fsf@red-bean.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1227267046 24061 80.91.229.12 (21 Nov 2008 11:30:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:30:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: kfogel@red-bean.com, cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 21 12:31:47 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1L3UEj-0002xW-62 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:31:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50482 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L3UDZ-0002Kk-O4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:30:33 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L3UBj-0001jk-CN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:28:39 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L3UBi-0001j5-Hb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:28:38 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55869 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L3UBi-0001iz-CK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:28:38 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout5.012.net.il ([84.95.2.13]:42846) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L3UBj-00006D-7c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:28:39 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.i_mtaout5.012.net.il by i_mtaout5.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) id <0KAO00H00LAC5P00@i_mtaout5.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:30:31 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.14.29]) by i_mtaout5.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0KAO00H3WLAU6K00@i_mtaout5.012.net.il>; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:30:31 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9.1 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:105884 Archived-At: > So you object to naming them "code reviews"? That's OK, let's call them > "random comments", then. > > I just can't see how encouraging such random comments can hurt. I didn't say it will hurt. I said it won't help us make the code quality better, which I assumed what this was all about. Sounds like my assumption was wrong.