From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: PURESIZE increased (again) Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 20:07:17 +0300 Message-ID: References: <87lku5u6tx.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1145207263 31760 80.91.229.2 (16 Apr 2006 17:07:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 17:07:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 16 19:07:41 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FVAio-00055R-It for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2006 19:07:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FVAin-00025I-Uw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2006 13:07:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FVAiW-00022u-Rf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2006 13:07:20 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FVAiU-0001zX-0m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2006 13:07:20 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FVAiT-0001zE-Rb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2006 13:07:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.66] (helo=romy.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FVAiw-0005c8-ON for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2006 13:07:46 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-83-86.inter.net.il [80.230.83.86]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id DZL53642 (AUTH halo1); Sun, 16 Apr 2006 20:07:15 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: Romain Francoise In-reply-to: <87lku5u6tx.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> (message from Romain Francoise on Sun, 16 Apr 2006 12:56:42 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:52923 Archived-At: > From: Romain Francoise > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 12:56:42 +0200 > > I grant you that a 10,000 bytes increase for an overflow of 696 bytes > might be too much, but since the size keeps going up it's just preparing > for future changes... I don't see any need to prepare for future changes. When those changes come, if they require to enlarge PURESIZE, we will do it at that time. > As you may or may not know, since August 2005 I've been packaging weekly > snapshots of Emacs CVS for the Debian GNU/Linux operating system; > this gives me the opportunity to build Emacs automatically with a > variety of different configuration options and compiler flags every > week, so I catch these kinds of problems pretty quickly. I think the > overflow is caused this week by Bill's latest batch of changes to > Customize. My build is from today, so the Customize changes are already in.