From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: PURESIZE increased (again) Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 19:15:46 +0300 Message-ID: References: <87lku5u6tx.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> <200604272212.k3RMCe4C001158@jane.dms.auburn.edu> <200604272253.k3RMreIx001541@jane.dms.auburn.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1146241009 25047 80.91.229.2 (28 Apr 2006 16:16:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 16:16:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 28 18:16:43 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FZVdU-0004bk-H6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 18:16:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FZVdT-0005gZ-Kd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:16:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FZVdH-0005fZ-KV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:15:51 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FZVdF-0005fM-8k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:15:50 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FZVdF-0005fJ-0w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:15:49 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.20] (helo=nitzan.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FZVgP-00029H-HV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:19:05 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-12-254.inter.net.il [80.230.12.254]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id DFR95318 (AUTH halo1); Fri, 28 Apr 2006 19:15:46 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: Andreas Schwab In-reply-to: (message from Andreas Schwab on Fri, 28 Apr 2006 16:18:22 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:53561 Archived-At: > From: Andreas Schwab > Cc: Luc Teirlinck , eliz@gnu.org, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 16:18:22 +0200 > > The padding used by pure_alloc depends on USE_LSB_TAG, which may explain > the difference. Thanks. But this will only explain the difference if Reiner says that he disabled USE_LSB_TAG (which AFAIK is on by default on x86_64 GNU/Linux systems). I simply built the checked-out tree, so my value of USE_LSB_TAG should be the default. Reiner?