From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: two more emacs questions Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 06:12:11 +0200 Message-ID: References: <009d01c70a7b$6731f190$6b01a8c0@dimalaptop> <007501c70b41$38a95630$6b01a8c0@dimalaptop> <004a01c70b90$1720f320$6b01a8c0@dimalaptop> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1163909561 14032 80.91.229.2 (19 Nov 2006 04:12:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 04:12:41 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 19 05:12:39 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gle2l-0003eO-PR for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 05:12:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gle2l-0007ZD-7k for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Nov 2006 23:12:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gle2U-0007Wo-92 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Nov 2006 23:12:18 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gle2S-0007Vz-PW for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Nov 2006 23:12:17 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gle2S-0007Vq-LV for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Nov 2006 23:12:16 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.73] (helo=heller.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Gle2S-0003en-F2 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Nov 2006 23:12:16 -0500 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-229-233-162.inter.net.il [84.229.233.162]) by heller.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id BAK20126 (AUTH halo1); Sun, 19 Nov 2006 06:12:09 +0200 (IST) Original-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org In-reply-to: <004a01c70b90$1720f320$6b01a8c0@dimalaptop> (vb@vsbe.com) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:38811 Archived-At: > From: "vb" > Cc: "Eli Zaretskii" > Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 20:06:25 -0800 > > well, that's the thing - I am a user, not a computer, I don't care if typing > keys changes the buffer or not. As a user I expect the undo sequence to > exactly follow my actions in the reverse order. I just checked - even MS > Word does this (brings back the highlight in the undo stream). Feel free to suggest a new feature on emacs-devel@gnu.org. > Too bad emacs' designers did not think about it this way They did. They just didn't implement it yet.