From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Printing from WindowXP version of emacs Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 10:39:40 +0200 Message-ID: References: <534d19de0601031634o49dfd53dl7d701ff6512900f9@mail.gmail.com> <6FC795CC-C015-4A12-81DF-15E01A9E9EDA@Web.DE> <534d19de0601041756x783e8094v1f0397efaa7a6662@mail.gmail.com> <43BD3E2E.50402@student.lu.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1136537875 26240 80.91.229.2 (6 Jan 2006 08:57:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 08:57:55 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 06 09:57:51 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EunPt-0000Ya-EF for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2006 09:57:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EunRe-00049F-LG for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2006 03:59:34 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EunAH-0007a8-7A for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2006 03:41:37 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EunAF-0007Zq-UC for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2006 03:41:36 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EunAF-0007Zk-LF for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2006 03:41:35 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.20] (helo=nitzan.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EunBy-0007L7-5X for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2006 03:43:22 -0500 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-160-206.inter.net.il [84.228.160.206]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id CJT29406 (AUTH halo1); Fri, 6 Jan 2006 10:39:39 +0200 (IST) Original-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org In-reply-to: (message from Peter Dyballa on Thu, 5 Jan 2006 22:17:22 +0100) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:32480 Archived-At: > From: Peter Dyballa > Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 22:17:22 +0100 > Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org > > > It is not clear to me whether you mean that this is a bug in ps- > > print.el or that it is a limitation in the current handling of > > fonts in PostScript. I am sorry that I do not understand this yet, > > but can you explain the status of this again? > > It is both! ps-print.el destroys the original encoding, and PS > usually handles font encodings with up to 256 mappings. (And ps- > print.el has no code to handle CID encoded fonts with up to 64 K > mappings.) Would you please stop spreading incorrect information? Emacs includes ps-mule.el, which is an add-on to ps-print that allows Emacs to print any characters supported by Emacs on a PostScript printer. Perhaps you should look at the code before you talk about what is and what isn't a bug there.