From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Abrahams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs antialiasing in X Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 20:51:07 -0500 Message-ID: References: <200601161353.k0GDrZBx010466@coolsville.localdomain> <87y81gb0cn.fsf@boost-consulting.com> <0764532B-549F-4BB4-985E-9B93D89BB403@swipnet.se> <87zmlw9bbl.fsf@boost-consulting.com> <43CCAC2B.7040808@swipnet.se> <87hd8298yy.fsf@boost-consulting.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1137721935 5546 80.91.229.2 (20 Jan 2006 01:52:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 01:52:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Miles Bader Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 20 02:52:12 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EzlRj-0002qV-OZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 02:52:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EzlUC-0000yC-FE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 20:54:44 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EzlU3-0000xq-1F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 20:54:35 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EzlU2-0000xe-6u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 20:54:34 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EzlU2-0000xb-5E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 20:54:34 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1EzlY9-0003Z9-W3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 20:58:50 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1EzlRR-0002nd-2x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 02:51:53 +0100 Original-Received: from 209-150-60-201.c3-0.smr-ubr2.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([209.150.60.201]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 02:51:53 +0100 Original-Received: from dave by 209-150-60-201.c3-0.smr-ubr2.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 02:51:53 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 43 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 209-150-60-201.c3-0.smr-ubr2.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:OOqcoGjOA9GkGNCONilszXUeoyA= X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:49290 Archived-At: Miles Bader writes: > 2006/1/18, David Abrahams : >> > I've attached a diff from HEAD 2006-01-12 10:24 to the XFT branch (the >> > latest sync with head occurred then). It is not that much. >> >> I could easily(?) apply this patch to emacs-unicode-2 myself, but I >> don't want to duplicate work if Miles is going to do it too. So, >> Miles, what'll it be? > > My only concern is if any branch merging is done. > > If you want to apply this patch directly on the emacs-unicode-2 > branch, and work there, then I've no reason to be involved (I dunno > whether that's acceptable to Kenichi et al though). I guess I would be slightly more comfortable if someone with more experience with the emacs codebase (like you) wanted to merge the two branches together. It seems like a lot to ask, but you did volunteer :). However, it sounds like it's a small thing so if you want to back out, I can probably manage. > If you want to work on a new branch (derived from emacs-unicode-2), > and later merge it into emacs-unicode-2, then I'd like to be the one > that creates the new branch (and later merges it back into > emacs-unicode-2). > > So if it's the latter, give me the word, and I'll make a new > branch. Well, that would keep me out of everyone's hair -- if someone will give me commit privileges, that is. Who do I ask? Otherwise I'll have to ask somebody to keep committing my intermediate work. > [Actually, probably the simplest thing to do is for me to make it a > clone of emacs-unicode-2, and let you apply Jan's patch.] Won't that make *more* work when things are integrated? -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com