From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bootstrap failed Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 14:43:27 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20060222105741.GA16886@emacsfans.org> <20060223114149.GA29887@flame.pc> <87u0aqw9mj.fsf@emacsfans.tsinghua.edu.cn> <87k6bjiq8a.fsf@emacsfans.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1140871505 13592 80.91.229.2 (25 Feb 2006 12:45:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 12:45:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 25 13:45:00 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FCynC-0002lh-6p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Feb 2006 13:44:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FCynD-0006Dj-Tt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Feb 2006 07:45:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FCylw-00055W-Sk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Feb 2006 07:43:41 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FCylu-00053m-Q2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Feb 2006 07:43:40 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FCylt-00052o-T8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Feb 2006 07:43:38 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.17] (helo=gandalf.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FCymC-0007rO-LS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Feb 2006 07:43:56 -0500 Original-Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (nitzan.inter.net.il [192.114.186.20]) by gandalf.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.1-GA) with ESMTP id HZC15995; Sat, 25 Feb 2006 14:43:29 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-215-175.inter.net.il [84.228.215.175]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id CTX95429 (AUTH halo1); Sat, 25 Feb 2006 14:43:28 +0200 (IST) Original-To: Zhang Wei In-reply-to: <87k6bjiq8a.fsf@emacsfans.org> (message from Zhang Wei on Sat, 25 Feb 2006 20:21:09 +0800) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:50959 Archived-At: > Cc: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr, emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Zhang Wei > Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 20:21:09 +0800 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > What ``other packages'' were those? I think it's important to know > > this. > > Can't reproduce this problem now. Sorry for that. So many packages had > been installed. I was configuring a new debian linux box then. But the package installation logs and the time stamp of the built Emacs should give you enough data to find out what packages were installed between the last failure and the first success, no? If so, please post the list of those packages, even if it's long. There might be a problem there which we need to find and solve. TIA