From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: delete-process bug Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 01:11:51 +0300 Message-ID: References: <87k69eyddj.fsf@lrde.org> <20060524112846.GA12046@agmartin.aq.upm.es> <87bqtmjrsh.fsf_-_@lrde.org> <87odxjakox.fsf@lrde.org> <8764jrlewm.fsf@lrde.org> <87pshyqgtd.fsf@lrde.org> <87fyiuq9t5.fsf@lrde.org> <877j45rj3w.fsf@lrde.org> <87k684y4uz.fsf@lrde.org> <87irnofqy8.fsf@lrde.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1148940746 8598 80.91.229.2 (29 May 2006 22:12:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 22:12:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: agustin.martin@hispalinux.es, storm@cua.dk, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 30 00:12:19 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FkpyB-0006An-5g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 May 2006 00:12:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FkpyA-0006rW-9X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 May 2006 18:12:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fkpxy-0006rR-Jj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 May 2006 18:12:02 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fkpxx-0006rF-A0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 May 2006 18:12:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fkpxx-0006rC-6W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 May 2006 18:12:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.20] (helo=nitzan.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Fkq3b-0003Io-Sx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 May 2006 18:17:52 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-57-170.inter.net.il [80.230.57.170]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id DMO53808 (AUTH halo1); Tue, 30 May 2006 01:11:51 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: michael.cadilhac@lrde.org (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Micha=EBl?= Cadilhac) In-reply-to: <87irnofqy8.fsf@lrde.org> (michael.cadilhac@lrde.org) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:55459 Archived-At: > From: michael.cadilhac@lrde.org (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Micha=EBl?= Cadilhac) > Cc: agustin.martin@hispalinux.es, emacs-devel@gnu.org, storm@cua.dk > Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 23:42:39 +0200 > > I will summarize the whole thing: Thanks. I think I understand now. > AFAICT, both functions are just in a #ifdef subprocesses. But, maybe, > in some systems, sigchld_handler is not used albeit compiled. > > The question I asked is : do we have to disable the > `deleted_process_alist' mechanism in some configuration to avoid that > it will be filled but never cleaned ? Well, as we established, at least on MS-Windows, sigchld_handler _is_ called, so your fix should work for the Windows build, AFAIU.