From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Choice of fonts displaying etc/HELLO Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 06:22:15 +0300 Message-ID: References: <48900ED2.2000703@gnu.org> <4890670C.9000009@gnu.org> <48906865.4000808@gnu.org> <48907856.6040308@gnu.org> <48930CE4.5080305@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1218079484 4495 80.91.229.12 (7 Aug 2008 03:24:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 03:24:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, jasonr@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Kenichi Handa Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 07 05:25:34 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KQw83-0005SI-AR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 05:25:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55311 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KQw77-00021f-RW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 23:24:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KQw73-00021T-VY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 23:24:29 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KQw73-000215-3e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 23:24:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36170 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KQw72-000212-Uj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 23:24:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout6.012.net.il ([84.95.2.16]:37033) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KQw6z-000124-EB; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 23:24:25 -0400 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.239.230]) by i-mtaout6.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0K57009ENO1IQU10@i-mtaout6.012.net.il>; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 06:22:31 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (1203?) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:102143 Archived-At: > From: Kenichi Handa > CC: lekktu@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, jasonr@gnu.org > Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 10:14:53 +0900 > > In article , Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > > (re-search-forward "\\cj") can effectively search for > > > characters belonging to Japanese charset. It is used, for > > > instance, in japanese-hankaku-region (in japan-util.el), and > > > "\\cc" is used in encode-hz-region (in china-util.el). > > > Well, would it still work if "\\cj" matches Katakana and Hiragana > > characters? > > ??? It matched in Emacs 22 and still matches in Emacs 23. > So, it still works, of course. I meant would it break something if "\\cj" matched only the Katakana and Hiragana characters instead of what it matches today?