From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: numeri Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 20:05:18 +0200 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1227981924 30014 80.91.229.12 (29 Nov 2008 18:05:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 18:05:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, handa@m17n.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 29 19:06:27 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1L6UD4-00008s-Od for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Nov 2008 19:06:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43033 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L6UBv-00053u-0L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Nov 2008 13:05:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L6UBq-00053J-Np for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Nov 2008 13:05:10 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L6UBp-000528-U7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Nov 2008 13:05:10 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55420 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L6UBp-00051z-QW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Nov 2008 13:05:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout2.012.net.il ([84.95.2.4]:19808) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L6UBp-00040P-7y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Nov 2008 13:05:09 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.i_mtaout2.012.net.il by i_mtaout2.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) id <0KB300900WUK2A00@i_mtaout2.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Nov 2008 20:07:15 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.156.55]) by i_mtaout2.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0KB300KX5X029B70@i_mtaout2.012.net.il>; Sat, 29 Nov 2008 20:07:15 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9.1 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:106311 Archived-At: > From: Andreas Schwab > Cc: handa@m17n.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 18:39:51 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Right, but why backslash? Why not something like `digit-four'? > > I don't understand the question. What is digit-four in this context? I meant to ask why would it be worse idea to have (get-char-code-property ?4 'numeric-value) return a symbol `digit-four' or `digit-4'. But maybe the answer is because `\4' is ready for the Lisp reader, while the alternatives are not.