From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: XXX-done messages not working for me Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 15:35:31 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20090110202429.GC4782@volo.donarmstrong.com> <3sknm4vlu.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <20090127025647.GK25486@rzlab.ucr.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1233408946 15091 80.91.229.12 (31 Jan 2009 13:35:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 13:35:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Don Armstrong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 31 14:37:00 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LTG1r-0003qi-Co for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 14:36:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41399 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LTG0Z-0005M5-0i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 08:35:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LTG0T-0005M0-H9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 08:35:33 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LTG0R-0005Lo-MK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 08:35:32 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52740 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LTG0R-0005Ll-IO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 08:35:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout7.012.net.il ([84.95.2.19]:52820) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LTG0R-0002JV-54 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 08:35:31 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout7.012.net.il by i-mtaout7.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KEC008008E8SG00@i-mtaout7.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 15:35:50 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.109.18]) by i-mtaout7.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KEC00MBM8FP6090@i-mtaout7.012.net.il>; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 15:35:50 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <20090127025647.GK25486@rzlab.ucr.edu> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (1203?) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:108459 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:56:47 -0800 > From: Don Armstrong > > On Mon, 26 Jan 2009, Glenn Morris wrote: > > Glenn Morris wrote: > > > > > I've had a similar problem: in recent days, some mails sent to > > > control@emacsbugs just disappear into thin air, with no reply of any > > > kind. Eg > > > > Same again for > > > > Message-ID: <18814.22591.392341.412020@fencepost.gnu.org> > > Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:41:35 -0500 > > > > (don't know why I'm bothering to report it) > > Your message didn't have a subject, so hit some of the anti-spam rules > that trigger on that. Should we add this caveat to admin/notes/bug-tracker?