From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: UUIDGEN in lisp Date: 18 Feb 2004 08:34:11 +0200 Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1077086124 27057 80.91.224.253 (18 Feb 2004 06:35:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 06:35:24 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 18 07:35:18 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AtLIk-0003Oy-00 for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 07:35:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AtLH1-0000wX-AY for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 01:33:31 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AtLGd-0000uw-8o for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 01:33:07 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AtLG7-0000kN-DX for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 01:33:06 -0500 Original-Received: from [207.232.27.5] (helo=WST0054) by monty-python.gnu.org with asmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AtLG6-0000iY-Pj for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 01:32:35 -0500 Original-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org In-reply-to: (message from Jesper Harder on Tue, 17 Feb 2004 22:21:07 +0100) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:16959 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help:16959 > Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help > From: Jesper Harder > Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 22:21:07 +0100 > > So you're saying that `raw-text-unix' and `binary' are completely > equivalent today, right? Yes, it seems like that. But the exact meaning of both raw-text and no-conversion has changed several times since Emacs 20.1, so I'd suggest to preserve the distinction mentally, to keep your sanity.