From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Better default values for tooltip padding and `tooltip-hide-delay'? Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 22:27:41 +0100 Message-ID: References: <877jcyowy9.fsf@wigwam.deepwood.net> <87d5moj82m.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1128461559 26021 80.91.229.2 (4 Oct 2005 21:32:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 21:32:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 04 23:32:38 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EMuNh-0007Xr-7e for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 23:31:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EMuNg-0000FZ-UU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 17:31:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EMuLX-0007sm-B8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 17:29:11 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EMuLU-0007rr-8C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 17:29:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EMuLU-0007rl-1t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 17:29:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [194.106.33.237] (helo=outmail.freedom2surf.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1EMuLT-0001Ap-Ld for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 17:29:08 -0400 Original-Received: from wanchan.jasonrumney.net (i-83-67-23-108.freedom2surf.net [83.67.23.108]) by outmail.freedom2surf.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j94LT5ch020705; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 22:29:05 +0100 Original-Received: from TONKOTSU-RAMEN (tonkotsu-ramen.jasonrumney.net [10.0.0.28]) by wanchan.jasonrumney.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4508DDD1D; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 22:29:19 +0100 (BST) Original-To: cs-usenet@arcor.de In-Reply-To: (Christian Schlauer's message of "Tue, 04 Oct 2005 20:14:48 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (windows-nt) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:43551 Archived-At: Christian Schlauer writes: > Jason Rumney writes: > >> We should find out exactly what GNOME uses (it may be a fraction of >> the font height for example) and try to be consistent with that. > > Will you pursue that? I'd really like to see this changed ... gtk+/gtk/gtktooltips.c has a hardcoded "border width" of 4. It is difficult to tell whether gtk's "border-width" is equivalent to Emacs' internal-border-width, or internal-border-width + border-width, since I can't put both tooltips next to each other for a careful comparison.