From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mathias Dahl Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: multi-region.el --- Mapping commands over multiple active regions. Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 13:47:47 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1136820327 8037 80.91.229.2 (9 Jan 2006 15:25:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 15:25:27 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 09 16:25:23 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EvysN-0005sK-46 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 16:24:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Evyos-00027Y-Nn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 10:20:26 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EvwqI-0001mB-MT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 08:13:46 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EvweO-0007ul-1l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 08:01:29 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EvwSW-00050Z-3j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 07:49:12 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1EvwUn-0001R5-7x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 07:51:33 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1EvwQQ-0007rA-TN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 13:47:02 +0100 Original-Received: from user.ifsab.se ([193.41.170.225]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 13:47:02 +0100 Original-Received: from brakjoller by user.ifsab.se with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 13:47:02 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 15 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: user.ifsab.se User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Odqk/z5dN5R6eSxH5hwFMPCqk+A= X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:48874 Archived-At: "Richard M. Stallman" writes: > Sure, if you don't change anything between one call and the other. > They would both operate from the same data structure. > ... > > Maybe these functions are only helper functions, and when I need the > *real* end of a region, I will ask for it explicitly using the > beginning of the region as argument? > > Sorry, I do not understand the issue or the scenario. I cannot explain it better than that. I just got a bad feeling, sorry. It's probably just me. :)