From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.comp.gcc.fortran,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs and GFortran Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 22:22:22 +0200 Message-ID: References: <200611011037.12356.wt@atmos.colostate.edu> <20061101180354.GA62686@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20061101203931.E775C4401A@Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE> <20061101213056.GA63890@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20061101215142.51A0944013@Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE> <20061101223548.GA72295@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20061101224912.ED10144013@Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE> <20061101232634.GA44475@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20061102132624.0D3E74400B@Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE> <20061102190005.GA6116@meiner.onlinehome.de> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1162499001 21743 80.91.229.2 (2 Nov 2006 20:23:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 20:23:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ams@gnu.org, fortran@gcc.gnu.org, wt@atmos.colostate.edu, sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: fortran-return-15417-gcgf-fortran=m.gmane.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Nov 02 21:23:14 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcgf-fortran@gmane.org Original-Received: from sourceware.org ([209.132.176.174]) by ciao.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gfj5S-00007m-Tw for gcgf-fortran@gmane.org; Thu, 02 Nov 2006 21:22:55 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 17501 invoked by alias); 2 Nov 2006 20:22:51 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 17489 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Nov 2006 20:22:49 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Original-Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Nov 2006 20:22:41 +0000 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-229-206-191.inter.net.il [84.229.206.191]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id GDR10477 (AUTH halo1); Thu, 2 Nov 2006 22:22:17 +0200 (IST) Original-To: Thomas Koenig In-reply-to: <20061102190005.GA6116@meiner.onlinehome.de> (message from Thomas Koenig on Thu, 2 Nov 2006 20:00:05 +0100) Mailing-List: contact fortran-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Original-Sender: fortran-owner@gcc.gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.gcc.fortran:15386 gmane.emacs.devel:61625 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 20:00:05 +0100 > From: Thomas Koenig > Cc: fortran@gcc.gnu.org, wt@atmos.colostate.edu, > Steve Kargl , emacs-devel@gnu.org > > If your patch is non-trivial, we need copyright papers from you > assigning copyright of any changes to the gcc source tree to > the FSF. Do you have a copyright assignment? Yes, he does (and you should have been able to check that yourself in copyright.list). > If these conditions are met, then post the patch to > gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org and fortran@gcc.gnu.org. Usually there > will be a discussion of the patch, possibly leading to requirements > for changes. Finally, if all goes well, a maintainer will approve > the patch and (if you don't have commit privileges) commit it. If I were Alfred, I'd hesitate to submit a patch, given the attitude of several GFortranners. That attitude is so hostile that I'd suggest to talk to the steering committee about it. > That's the way gcc and gfortran maintenance works. In practice, > it works pretty well. Well for whom, exactly?