From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 23:19:27 +0200 Message-ID: References: <85tzxazb8r.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87ps7x4clj.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> <85irdpweuq.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87ejocik1a.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <85hct8ovog.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85fy8riafz.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1172611238 5043 80.91.229.12 (27 Feb 2007 21:20:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:20:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 27 22:20:29 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HM9kJ-000868-T2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 22:20:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HM9kJ-00035K-I7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 16:20:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HM9jP-00026O-AG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 16:19:31 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HM9jN-000250-UO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 16:19:30 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HM9jN-00024e-Mt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 16:19:29 -0500 Original-Received: from romy.inter.net.il ([213.8.233.24]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HM9jM-0000fA-HN; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 16:19:28 -0500 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-163-35.inter.net.il [80.230.163.35]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id HGD98137 (AUTH halo1); Tue, 27 Feb 2007 23:19:22 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <85fy8riafz.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup on Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:59:12 +0100) X-detected-kernel: FreeBSD 4.7-5.2 (or MacOS X 10.2-10.4) (2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:66956 Archived-At: > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: David Kastrup > Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:59:12 +0100 > > > Inaccurate. First, font-lock was turned off by default in _all_ > > versions of Emacs since its introduction (in v19.x, AFAIR). More > > importantly, a large majority of users turned it on, > > I'd like to see some statistics supporting that. A large majority of > users does not touch defaults, according to my experience. One evidence I can offer is the number of discussions between developers where different people tried many times to convince Richard to turn font-lock on by default.