From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#720: Patch to fix CVS Emacs compilation error on Windows XP SP2. Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 11:22:07 +0300 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii , 720@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1218790075 5461 80.91.229.12 (15 Aug 2008 08:47:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 08:47:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, 720@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: Francis Litterio Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 15 10:48:46 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KTuzG-0006rw-B4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Aug 2008 10:48:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37487 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KTuyH-0004tQ-Tm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Aug 2008 04:47:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KTuyD-0004sE-9p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Aug 2008 04:47:41 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KTuyB-0004qN-Au for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Aug 2008 04:47:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33041 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KTuyB-0004q7-5Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Aug 2008 04:47:39 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:44155) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KTuyA-0003ch-Bo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Aug 2008 04:47:39 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m7F8lPPc008875; Fri, 15 Aug 2008 01:47:25 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m7F8U6uM003285; Fri, 15 Aug 2008 01:30:06 -0700 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs , don@donarmstrong.com Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 08:30:06 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 720 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs,w32 X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 720-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B720.12187885381329 (code B ref 720); Fri, 15 Aug 2008 08:30:06 +0000 Original-Received: (at 720) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 15 Aug 2008 08:22:18 +0000 Original-Received: from mtaout7.012.net.il (mtaout7.012.net.il [84.95.2.19]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m7F8MErD001316 for <720@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Fri, 15 Aug 2008 01:22:15 -0700 Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.211.50]) by i-mtaout7.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0K5M00JE1V9IOR20@i-mtaout7.012.net.il> for 720@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; Fri, 15 Aug 2008 11:22:31 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 04:47:40 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:19455 Archived-At: > Cc: 720@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, > Stefan Monnier > Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:15:04 -0400 > From: Francis Litterio > > w32.c(3820) : error C2520: conversion from unsigned __int64 to double not implemented, use signed __int64 "Not implemented"? I'm not sure we want to support such a deficient compiler. How about this: DWORD tot_hi = memstex.ullTotalPhys >> 32; DWORD tot_md = (memstex.ullTotalPhys & 0x00000000ffffffffLL) >> 10; DWORD tot_lo = memstex.ullTotalPhys % 1024LL; totphys = tot_hi * 4194304.0 + tot_md + tot_lo / 1024.0; Does this work?