From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Changes to windows.texi Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 20:47:09 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4914514C.9020700@gmx.at> <4915EF09.3080806@gmx.at> <49160A81.7050208@gmx.at> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1226256485 5505 80.91.229.12 (9 Nov 2008 18:48:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 18:48:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 09 19:49:08 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KzFLI-000429-2O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Nov 2008 19:49:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45216 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KzFKA-000800-Lv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Nov 2008 13:47:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KzFK7-0007zp-Gi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Nov 2008 13:47:47 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KzFK5-0007zc-QV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Nov 2008 13:47:46 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43595 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KzFK5-0007zX-Jv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Nov 2008 13:47:45 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout2.012.net.il ([84.95.2.4]:32949) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KzFJT-0005tr-Ag; Sun, 09 Nov 2008 13:47:07 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.i_mtaout2.012.net.il by i_mtaout2.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) id <0KA200B00XIQZM00@i_mtaout2.012.net.il>; Sun, 09 Nov 2008 20:48:53 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.241.172]) by i_mtaout2.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0KA2004XLXLG4R22@i_mtaout2.012.net.il>; Sun, 09 Nov 2008 20:48:53 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9.1 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:105504 Archived-At: > From: "Richard M. Stallman" > Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 10:13:37 -0500 > Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > > I think it's a convention to have the first paragraph of a section not > > > to be indented, and indent all the others, although the manual is not > > > always consistent in this. > > > > It seems to me that more often the first paragraph is indented and the > > remaining ones aren't. > > I think this is a mistake, but let's see what Richard says. > > It does not make a big difference, but the cleanest thing is to treat > all the paragraphs in one manual the same. The Texinfo manual's recommendations are like I said above.